This post came about as a morning of drinking coffee and reading the cognoscenti of the internet.   Specific to this post is Aurelian, who, while not supplanting JMG as my preferred internet guru, is giving our gracious host a run for his money.

This is the phrasing that caught my attention and led to this post:

Perhaps the most obvious point to start from is that It Was Different Then. All modern societies have great difficulty in accepting this, because they live in an eternal present, where the past, if it nonetheless differed slightly from our more blessed present state, was clearly advancing towards it. This may be compared with the traditional, pre-Enlightenment, view that the world was better in the old days, and that we have been in a state of continuous decline ever since. At least until a couple of hundred years ago, older was better, and the wisest and more knowledgeable people had lived, by definition, the longest time ago. And of course there are many societies that view human history itself as patterned or cyclic. (Western attempts at that—Toynbee, Spengler—seem inherently unconvincing to me, because they try to construct ambitious theories on a very fragile evidential base, where we have no certainty that the future will be like the past.)


Yet common sense tells us that it was different then, and often the changes are quite rapid. When you have racked up a certain number of years on the odometer of life, you quickly realise that changes have taken place even within your own lifetime. So it seems clear, for example, that the much-vaunted relative openness and tolerance of western societies was in fact a historical exception that lasted in its mature form from the 1970s to the 2000s, before slowly reverting to the generally intolerant nature of the past.

I think that the single most important thing that one can do to enter into the “age of frugality” is to come to a clear-eyed understanding of the past from where we come.  

JMG refers to this as the “Heresy of Technological Choice”.  I think of it as understanding the awkward path we have taken to get from where we were prior to the age of oil to the wretched land of  commercial excess that we inhabit now.

Actually, if nothing else, this reading and thinking exercise takes minimal effort.  It is just a way to evaluate where you stand now and the options open to you in the future.  The current commercial dream is that the oligarchs will sell you the things you need to get by in the age of frugality.  This is a false myth, based on their need to keep sales up, but that path is closing day by day.

Lately, I have been watching an odd little YouTube channel named “Townsends”.  The guy is in love with the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.  I admire his immersion and his passion for that particular period, and I get the impression that he has done some serious research into the century and the attending culture.

Don’t think for a moment that I am advocating a return to the lifestyles and the attitudes of that period of time, nosireebob, I am content with being fat, dumb, happy, and old.  I am in a continuing process of stripping down my life in a pale imitation of a Stylite monk circa 450 A.D. (a very pale imitation and you can rest assured that mortification of the flesh has been completely purged from the curriculum).  

So choose a period of time where you think that our culture will resemble in fifty years.  Start there and figure out how folks lived then and ponder what you need to do to get from where you are now to the technological/lifestyle suite of technologies and habits that you think that you will need to inhabit.

A final thought.  Remember that it was a process and a staircase to get from then to now.  It will be a process and a staircase (maybe the risers of the stairs will have greater height, maybe not) so getting there tomorrow just makes you look kinda silly.

But overall, remember that the future will be as different as the past.  We can take from the past where needed, but the future won’t be either the present or the past.  Look for strategies, frugality is a tactic, what is your strategy?

 

Hello

Oct. 29th, 2023 11:04 am
 



I suppose that the powers that run blogging sites must have a conniption when folks like me sign up.  A “serious” writer who valued his “image” or “brand” would stay with his site and “grow” his readership to increase the number of “hits” and thus properly monetize the time spent in front of a screen puking out screed.

I guess that I am not a serious writer then.  

I suppose that I use things like sites to document the changes in overall outlook and interests.  My first blog lasted for around 15 years and covered the period of time when I was a corporate and/or government flunky.     When I started to put things together to retire and leave the humdrum day to day grubbing for nickels I started another blog over at Wordpress, but ended it soon due to Wordpresses unending and nauseating fees for anything.  So then I ended up at my first Dreamwidth account which got me through the transition from wage-slave to retired parasite.  I began a serialized book and ran with that for a while until I decided that 1-) I didn’t like the characters, 2-) I thought the plot was thin and 3.) I didn’t like being constrained by someone else’s “universe”.

I started casting around for a different place to set up shop around the same time that I was bowing out of the workplace and I tried Substack on for size. It definitely wasn’t for me, for the most part, it is a self-contained circle-jerk where wannabe writers spend time giving each other a reach around.  No thank you.

So, I am retiring all the old blog attempts as they were reflections of a “me” that really isn’t around anymore.  But I still have the reading and writing bug infecting me and I need a place to sit down and do a diary when the need takes me.  

I think that a “blog” as differentiated from “diary” is made by the simple need regarding how and the intent a person has to communicate with someone else.  Mostly a diary is for personal use and as an aide-memoire for folks who think enough to require notes on where their thoughts strayed that particular day.  

A blog is an intent to “monetize” the author’s scribblings.  Oh, they may do so very subtly, and I don’t in any way judge them harshly for this.  A person has to eat.  But I think that there are a lot of bloggers out there who spend a lot of time and considerable effort chasing the idea that someone is going to deposit some nickels in a bank account.  For a lot of the folks who blog that deposit of the filthy lucre will legitimize their obsession.

Just to be clear, I do fork over money to folks who write well.  John Michael Greer and Aurelian provide me with excellent thoughts to ponder,  and while I give them money, it is my sincere hope that they will use it for fine food and wine.  But if they use it to pay for the electricity or to defray other essentials, that might be even better.

So, I am just getting back to writing a diary.  I suppose that I could do this kind of thing on my computer not connected to the internet, but I suppose that I do need a little feedback off and on.  The idea of a secret diary always seemed kind of odd to me.  You are trying to communicate, that is the whole purpose of language (and this is a subject that is going to be discussed in depth here). So if I write, communication exists, even if it is only between the person I am today and the person who wrote the piece.

I am going to just write essays when a complex subject presents its ugly head in my cranium.  Other times I will just blurt out short questions.  Recipes and other simple things will probably show up off and on.

So, if you stumble across this little vanity, welcome to one of the affectations of an aging man.  

Profile

John

November 2023

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 12:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios